Sales practice · 12-minute exercise

Recruitment agencies: procurement review

Use this procurement review exercise to answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process. You are discussing a specialist recruitment assignment with a hiring manager with a hard-to-fill role. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.

LONED EditorialPublished Example + editable working sheet
What you will work towards

Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence.

The situation

In this fictional brief, interviewers assess different criteria and suitable candidates disengage. The buyer wants a shared scorecard and a timely, clearly owned hiring process. Your offer is a specialist recruitment assignment, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.

A relevant delivery constraint is that compensation and interview availability need approval before outreach. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.

Your counterparta hiring manager with a hard-to-fill role
Offer under discussiona specialist recruitment assignment
Evidence availablean anonymised candidate brief mapped to the agreed role criteria
Terms to clarifyClarify exclusivity, fee triggers, replacement terms and candidate consent.

How to approach procurement review

A useful question for this stage: “Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.

  1. Separate mandatory requirements from preferences. Assign owners to unanswered questions. Compare commercial terms on a consistent basis.
  2. Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which capability must the person demonstrate in the first three months?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
  3. Use evidence relevant to the decision: an anonymised candidate brief mapped to the agreed role criteria. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
  4. Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence.

Example exchange

An illustrative exchange. Real conversations will take a different path.

SellerWhich requirements must be satisfied before procurement can approve the agreement?

BuyerOur concern is that interviewers assess different criteria and suitable candidates disengage. Also, compensation and interview availability need approval before outreach.

SellerWhich capability must the person demonstrate in the first three months?

BuyerAnother recruiter charges a lower percentage.

SellerLet us compare the search scope, screening evidence and replacement terms before comparing fees alone.

SellerWhich item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it?

An industry-specific concern

Buyer: “Another recruiter charges a lower percentage.”

Possible response: “Let us compare the search scope, screening evidence and replacement terms before comparing fees alone.”

Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.

Run the practice

  1. Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays a hiring manager with a hard-to-fill role. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
  2. Have a five-minute conversation focused on answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
  3. Add this challenge: Procurement asks for a new obligation late in the process. Explain that it needs review rather than accepting it to save the deal.
  4. Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
  5. Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to calibrate the role using an agreed scorecard and sample candidate profiles. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.

What to avoid

Common mistakePromising exceptions that the delivery or legal team has not approved.
A stronger directionI can record that request and confirm the answer with the responsible person before we change the agreement.
Scope and claim boundaryDo not guarantee a hire or invent candidate availability.
What to measure in real worktime between candidate submission and a useful hiring decision. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change.

Your working sheet

Write your own version below. Notes are saved on this browser when local storage is available. Use Download to keep a separate copy; avoid adding confidential information on a shared device.

Example: interviewers assess different criteria and suitable candidates disengage; compensation and interview availability need approval before outreach.

Example: Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it? Industry question: Which capability must the person demonstrate in the first three months?

Example: an anonymised candidate brief mapped to the agreed role criteria. Do not guarantee a hire or invent candidate availability.

Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: calibrate the role using an agreed scorecard and sample candidate profiles. Confirm the owner and date.

Review your work

Tick only what you can support with your answer or practice. This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.

Questions about this resource

Who is this recruitment agencies exercise for?

Founders, salespeople and account managers preparing for a conversation about a specialist recruitment assignment. Adapt the brief to your real offer and authority before using it at work.

Can I use the example as a script?

Use the questions as prompts. Listen and respond to the buyer’s actual meaning. The target is to answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process, not to deliver a memorised speech.

How should I assess the result?

Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence. Use the three review questions below. The checklist is for reflection; it is not a validated prediction of sales performance.

Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale. About these resources.